{"id":2218,"date":"2026-11-02T01:05:18","date_gmt":"2026-11-02T06:05:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/?p=2218"},"modified":"2026-11-02T01:09:08","modified_gmt":"2026-11-02T06:09:08","slug":"plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0627\u0633\u062a\u0647\u0644\u0627\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0642\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0622\u0644\u0627\u062a \u062a\u0642\u0637\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062a\u064a\u0643: \u0644\u0645\u0627\u0630\u0627 \u064a\u064f\u0639\u062f \u00ab\u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a\u0644\u0648\u0648\u0627\u062a \u0644\u0643\u0644 \u0637\u0646\u00bb \u0647\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u064a\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0630\u064a \u064a\u0645\u0643\u0646 \u0645\u0642\u0627\u0631\u0646\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0647"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align:left!important;direction:ltr!important;float:none!important;width:100%!important;max-width:100%!important;margin-left:0!important;margin-right:0!important;\">\n<p>A buyer in Southeast Asia sent us two quotes for what he described as the same machine. Both had a 90 kW main motor. Both claimed 1.5 tonnes an hour. One was 18% cheaper.<\/p>\n<p>The cheap one would have cost him roughly twice as much to run. Not in some vague, hard-to-pin-down way \u2014 in a number you can put on the first page of a payback model. The two machines did not consume the same energy per tonne, and the reason had nothing to do with the nameplate on the motor.<\/p>\n<p>Plastic shredder energy consumption is the gap that most equipment purchases walk straight into. Motor power is quoted, throughput is quoted, and the number that decides your electricity bill for the next ten years \u2014 kilowatt-hours per tonne of material actually reduced \u2014 is not on any quote sheet.<\/p>\n<h2>\u0627\u0644\u0625\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062e\u062a\u0635\u0631\u0629<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Plastic shredder energy consumption is best measured in kWh per tonne, not in installed motor power.<\/strong> Installed power tells you what the machine is capable of drawing. Specific energy tells you what it costs per tonne you produce. The same 90 kW machine can run at 15 kWh\/t or at 60 kWh\/t on the same material, because what sets the number is the screen aperture, the feed condition, the blade state and the load factor \u2014 four things you control, and none of which appear in a brochure.<\/p>\n<p>Plastic shredder energy consumption read in the right order changes the buying decision. A machine that is 18% cheaper and 40% thirstier per tonne is not cheaper. It is a longer payment plan on the same electricity.<\/p>\n<p>The practical range on a well-run single-shaft shredder cutting rigid plastics through a 40\u201360 mm screen sits roughly between <strong>15 and 45 kWh per tonne<\/strong>. Above that band, the money is going somewhere other than cutting. Below it, you are probably running a coarser screen than the downstream stage needs.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Specific energy consumption (SEC) is the electrical energy a shredder draws divided by the mass it actually produces, expressed in kWh per tonne. It is the only energy figure that can be compared between machines of different motor size and different claimed capacity, because it normalises both. A machine&#8217;s installed power is an input rating; its SEC is a performance figure, and only the second one predicts your bill.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2>Where the kilowatt-hours go<\/h2>\n<p>A shredder motor does three kinds of work, and only one of them reduces material.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cutting.<\/strong> Shearing the polymer between rotor knife and counter-knife. This is the useful work, and on a properly fed machine it is most of the draw.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Re-cutting.<\/strong> Anything that does not pass the screen goes back around the chamber and gets hit again. Every one of those cycles is energy spent producing nothing new. This is the single biggest controllable loss, and the screen aperture is what sets it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Running empty or half-loaded.<\/strong> The rotor spins whether or not there is material against it. A gravity-fed machine with no ram control swings between near-stall and near-idle, and both ends waste energy \u2014 one through poor cutting, the other through pure no-load draw.<\/p>\n<p>That third point is why load factor matters as much as motor size. A machine held at a steady 0.75\u20130.85 load factor produces more tonnes per kilowatt-hour than an identical machine surging between 0.35 and 0.95, even though both might average the same motor current. Steady cutting is efficient cutting.<\/p>\n<h2>The screen is the biggest lever, and it is non-linear<\/h2>\n<p>If you take one thing from this article, take the table below.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u062f<\/th>\n<th>80 mm screen<\/th>\n<th>60 mm screen<\/th>\n<th>40 mm screen<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>LDPE \/ LLDPE film, baled, reasonably clean<\/td>\n<td>25\u201335 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>32\u201345 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>45\u201360 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PP woven sacks and big bags<\/td>\n<td>28\u201338 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>35\u201348 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>48\u201365 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PP \/ PE rigid crates, trays, closures<\/td>\n<td>18\u201326 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>22\u201332 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>30\u201342 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PE drums and thick-wall containers<\/td>\n<td>20\u201330 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>26\u201336 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>34\u201348 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PET bottles, whole, baled<\/td>\n<td>16\u201324 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>20\u201330 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>28\u201340 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mixed post-consumer rigid packaging<\/td>\n<td>22\u201334 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>28\u201342 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<td>38\u201355 kWh\/t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<blockquote>\n<p>These are indicative ranges for single-shaft shredding, not guarantees. The spread inside each cell covers blade condition, moisture, contamination and load factor. Treat them as a comparison tool between options, and as a sanity check when a supplier quotes you a single figure.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Two things fall out of that table.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Halving the aperture roughly doubles the specific energy.<\/strong> Going from 80 mm to 40 mm is not a 20% penalty. On rigid crates it is closer to a 70% increase; on film it is more than double. Material that has to be cut repeatedly to pass a finer screen pays for every one of those cycles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film is the most energy-hungry material per tonne, not the easiest.<\/strong> This runs against intuition. Soft material ought to be easy. It is not: elastic material absorbs energy by deforming rather than fracturing, and it has to be positively sheared between edge and counter-knife instead of simply broken. Film also has terrible bulk density, so the rotor spends more time per tonne dealing with air.<\/p>\n<p>The practical rule is the same one that governs screen choice generally: <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-screen-size-why-the-hole-sets-your-ceiling-not-your-flake-size\/\">the hole is a ceiling, not a setting<\/a>. Use the coarsest aperture your next machine can swallow, and the energy number follows.<\/p>\n<h2>Load factor: the number nobody quotes<\/h2>\n<p>Take two 110 kW machines.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Machine A runs at a 0.80 load factor and produces 1,200 kg\/h. Consumption: <strong>73 kWh\/t<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Machine B runs at a 0.45 load factor and produces 620 kg\/h. Consumption: <strong>80 kWh\/t<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Machine B burns more energy per tonne while producing half as much. It is not a worse motor. It is being fed badly \u2014 gravity feed, manual loading, someone dumping a wheelbarrow every few minutes and walking away.<\/p>\n<p>Plastic shredder energy consumption is decided here more than at the motor, which is why a hydraulic ram with load-following control is not a comfort feature. It is the mechanism that converts installed power into tonnes. On bulky, low-density feed, the difference between a controlled ram and a manual hopper is routinely the difference between a 0.8 load factor and a 0.5 one.<\/p>\n<p>The same logic explains why &#8220;it has a 90 kW motor, so it will be faster than the 75 kW one&#8221; is not a safe inference. Motor size sets a ceiling on cutting force. Feed control sets how much of that ceiling you actually reach.<\/p>\n<h2>Blade condition is an energy variable, not just a maintenance item<\/h2>\n<p>A dull edge does not cut. It rubs, tears and deforms. All three consume more energy per kilogram than shearing does, and they produce a worse flake while doing it.<\/p>\n<p>Measured throughput falls before the operator notices anything is wrong, because the machine still sounds like it is working. What has actually changed is that a growing share of the draw is going into friction at the cut face instead of separation. By the time output has visibly dropped, the machine has been running inefficiently for weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Indexable cutters are the cheap answer here. A four-edge insert that can be rotated on the machine turns one replacement into three short stops, and short stops happen on schedule while long ones get postponed. <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-blades-when-to-rotate-when-to-replace-and-why-yours-wear-out-too-fast\/\">When to rotate and when to replace<\/a> covers the wear pattern; the energy consequence of ignoring it is that every tonne processed after the edge dulls costs more than the tonne before.<\/p>\n<h2>Moisture and bulk density: the corrections that break capacity plans<\/h2>\n<p>Two feed properties quietly move both throughput and specific energy, and neither is usually in the specification.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0637\u0648\u0628\u0629.<\/strong> Surface water on plastics does two things: it takes energy to heat and displace, and on film it makes the material cling and bridge, which reduces the effective feed rate. A machine specified on dry feed and then run on wet post-consumer material will not deliver the quoted tonnes per hour, and will deliver them at a higher energy cost per tonne.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bulk density.<\/strong> Loose film below roughly 60 kg\/m\u00b3 and baled or densified feed above 250 kg\/m\u00b3 are not the same job, even at identical mass throughput. At low bulk density the cutting chamber is mostly air, the ram has less to push against, and the rotor does more work per kilogram. Capacity figures quoted from a baled-feed reference should be discounted heavily before you compare them to your loose material.<\/p>\n<p>This is the mechanism behind most of the &#8220;the machine does not hit its rated capacity&#8221; complaints we hear. It is rarely a broken promise. It is a rating taken at reference conditions and a plant running at something else.<\/p>\n<h2>How to compare two quotes without a test<\/h2>\n<p>You cannot measure specific energy from a datasheet. You can, however, force the comparison onto the right footing in four questions.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Ask this<\/th>\n<th>Why it changes the number<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>What screen aperture is that capacity quoted at?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>A figure at 80 mm and a figure at 40 mm are not comparable. This one question removes most of the illusion.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>What feed condition \u2014 baled, densified, loose, wet?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Bulk density and moisture both move throughput by large factors. A rating without a stated feed condition is a number, not a specification.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>What is the load factor at that capacity?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>If the supplier does not know, the capacity figure came from a calculation rather than a run.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>What is the specific energy, in kWh\/t, at that operating point?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>This is the answer that lets you build a cost per tonne. A supplier who can answer it has measured the machine. One who cannot has quoted it.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Add two checks of your own: what the ram does under load, and whether the cutters can be indexed without pulling the rotor. Both show up in the electricity figure eventually, one through load factor and the other through edge condition.<\/p>\n<h2>The arithmetic you should actually run<\/h2>\n<p>Specific energy only becomes a decision when you multiply it by your tariff and your tonnage.<\/p>\n<p>Take a plant running 400 tonnes a month, single shift, on a machine whose plastic shredder energy consumption works out at 30 kWh\/t, at an electricity price of $0.10\/kWh. That is $12,000 a year. Now compare a second option at 45 kWh\/t: $18,000 a year. A $6,000 annual gap, or $30,000 over five years, on a difference that never appeared on either quote.<\/p>\n<p>That number is the reason this article exists. It is also why comparing machines on purchase price alone is almost always the more expensive way to buy \u2014 a point <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-machine-cost-what-one-machine-actually-costs-you-after-you-buy-it\/\">the running-cost article<\/a> makes from the other direction, starting from what the machine costs you after it is installed rather than from what it draws.<\/p>\n<p>Note what this calculation deliberately leaves out: blade replacement, labour and downtime. In most plants those add up to more than electricity \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-machine-cost-what-one-machine-actually-costs-you-after-you-buy-it\/\">the four costs that dominate<\/a> puts cutters first, electricity second, which is the correct ranking. That is not an argument for ignoring specific energy. It is an argument for using it correctly: as the part of the operating cost you can predict from a datasheet, if the supplier will state the conditions behind it.<\/p>\n<p>One caution on the arithmetic: do not assume the machine runs at its rated motor power. A 90 kW motor at 0.75 load factor over an eight-hour shift draws roughly 540 kWh, not 720. Sizing your electricity budget on nameplate power overstates the bill and, worse, hides the real variable, which is tonnes produced against those kilowatt-hours.<\/p>\n<h2>Why this replaces adding up nameplate watts<\/h2>\n<p>Plant engineers used to estimate running cost by adding up the installed kilowatts on the machines and multiplying by hours and tariff. That method has two failure modes and they point in opposite directions.<\/p>\n<p>It overstates consumption, because no machine draws nameplate power continuously. A 90 kW shredder at 0.75 load factor over eight hours draws about 540 kWh, not 720. Budget on nameplate and you talk yourself out of a machine you can afford.<\/p>\n<p>It understates the difference between two machines, because nameplate power says nothing about how much of that power goes into cutting. Two machines of identical motor size can differ by 50% in kWh per tonne and nameplate arithmetic cannot see it.<\/p>\n<p>Add the auxiliaries and the gap widens again. A shredder on its own is an easy calculation. The same shredder with an infeed conveyor, a discharge conveyor, a dust extraction fan and a hydraulic power pack is a system, and the fans and hydraulics run whether or not the rotor is cutting. On a lightly loaded line the auxiliary draw can rival the main motor; on a heavily loaded one it disappears into the noise. If you are going to measure anything, measure at the meter that feeds the whole machine area, not at the main drive.<\/p>\n<h2>What this article is not<\/h2>\n<p>It is not a reason to buy the lowest-kWh machine on the market. A machine that consumes 20 kWh\/t while producing an unusable flake has not saved anything; it has converted electricity into material you cannot sell. Specific energy has to be read alongside output quality and uptime.<\/p>\n<p>It is also not a substitute for a material test. Send your actual material \u2014 wet, contaminated, whatever it really is \u2014 and ask for kWh\/t at the screen you intend to run. That is a fair request and a supplier who has measured their machine can answer it in an afternoon.<\/p>\n<h2>Spreadsheets lie before machines do<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Any figure you carry into a payback model should be checked against a real meter reading first.<\/strong> A pilot week on your own material, at your own screen aperture, removes more uncertainty than another page of specifications.<\/p>\n<p>Three portable clamp meters cost less than one set of cutters. Clamp the main drive, clamp the auxiliaries, log the meter at shift start and shift end, and weigh the output. One week of that gives you a specific-energy number for your plant, on your feed, that no supplier can argue with \u2014 and it gives you the baseline you need to notice the day the machine starts drifting. Specific energy creeping up 15% over a quarter is the earliest signal that cutters need indexing or a screen is blinding, and it shows up weeks before anyone hears a change in pitch.<\/p>\n<p>If you are not ready to buy, the same pilot answers a cheaper question: whether you need a machine at all. Some plants run it and discover their bottleneck was feed consistency, not size reduction.<\/p>\n<h2>What I would fix first, in order<\/h2>\n<p>Ranked by return per hour of effort, on almost any plastics shredding operation:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Open the screen to the coarsest aperture the next stage accepts.<\/strong> Free if you already own spare screens, and usually the largest single movement in the number.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Index the cutters before output drops.<\/strong> A four-edge insert turned on the machine costs a short stop. The same insert run to failure costs weeks of inefficient cutting before anyone notices.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Steady the feed.<\/strong> A ram with load-following control, or a metering conveyor, moves load factor further than any other single change.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Keep metal out of the chamber.<\/strong> The magnet is cheap. The expensive part is not the chipped knife, it is the day spent finding out why the flake went coarse.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Re-measure.<\/strong> Without a baseline you cannot prove steps one to four worked, and within a quarter you will drift back to where you started.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Electricity will not be the largest line in your operating cost \u2014 cutters usually are, with labour and downtime close behind. It is the line you can move fastest and cheapest, and it is the one that compounds quietly, shift after shift, while the machine still sounds fine.<\/p>\n<h2>Where this sits against the other numbers<\/h2>\n<p>Specific energy is one of four numbers worth having before you commit. The other three, in the order they usually matter:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Capacity in kg\/h at your feed condition<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-machine-capacity-what-one-machine-actually-puts-out-per-hour\/\">what one machine actually puts out<\/a> explains why the rated figure and the real figure differ, and by how much.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cost per tonne, all four lines<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-machine-cost-what-one-machine-actually-costs-you-after-you-buy-it\/\">the running-cost article<\/a> puts cutters, power, maintenance and labour side by side. Electricity is the second-largest, not the first.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Which machine family you should even be pricing<\/strong> \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/industrial-shredders-why-there-is-no-universal-machine-and-what-the-material-decides\/\">how material decides the machine<\/a> is the article to read if you have not settled that yet. Specific energy comparisons are meaningless across families.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you are comparing two complete setups rather than two machines, <a href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/two-machines-or-one-shredder-crusher-vs-integrated-unit-how-to-decide\/\">two machines or one<\/a> adds the auxiliary draw and the conveyor into the picture, which is exactly the part nameplate arithmetic misses.<\/p>\n<h2>The one-sentence version<\/h2>\n<p>If you remember nothing else: <strong>ask for kWh per tonne at the screen you intend to run, on your material, and treat everything else on the quote as a headline.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0633\u0626\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0639\u0629<\/h2>\n<p><strong>How much electricity does a plastic shredder use per ton?<\/strong><br \/>\nRoughly 15\u201345 kWh per tonne for rigid plastics on a single-shaft machine with a 40\u201360 mm screen, and 25\u201365 kWh per tonne for film and woven bags, depending on aperture, blade condition, moisture and load factor. The range is wide because the variables are. A single figure quoted without those qualifiers is not a specification.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Does a bigger motor use more electricity?<\/strong><br \/>\nNot necessarily. Motor size sets the ceiling on cutting force; consumption follows the work actually done. A larger motor running at a moderate load factor can consume less per tonne than a smaller motor fighting the same material at near-stall. The number that matters is kWh per tonne produced, not the nameplate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why does a smaller screen use so much more energy?<\/strong><br \/>\nBecause material that does not fit through the holes stays in the chamber and is cut again. Every additional cycle costs energy without producing new output. Going from an 80 mm to a 40 mm aperture roughly doubles specific energy on most materials, which is why the coarsest aperture that satisfies the downstream stage is almost always the cheapest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Is kWh per ton a standard figure I can compare between suppliers?<\/strong><br \/>\nThere is no universal test protocol that every manufacturer reports against, so a specific-energy figure is only comparable when the conditions behind it are stated: material, feed form, moisture, screen aperture, blade condition and load factor. Ask for all six. A supplier who can give them has measured the machine; one who cannot has estimated it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do dull blades really change energy consumption?<\/strong><br \/>\nYes, and before they change output. A worn edge rubs and tears instead of shearing, so more of the motor&#8217;s draw goes into friction at the cut face. Rotating indexable cutters on condition keeps specific energy near its baseline; waiting for visible throughput loss means running inefficiently for weeks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Does wet material cost more to shred?<\/strong><br \/>\nUsually. Surface water adds mass that has to be moved and heated, and on film it makes the material cling and bridge, which reduces effective feed rate. Both effects raise energy per tonne of dry output. If your feed is wet, ask for the capacity figure at that moisture content rather than the dry reference.<\/p>\n<p>Plastic shredder energy consumption is one of the few procurement numbers that rewards asking an uncomfortable question, and suppliers who have measured their machines will not mind it.<\/p>\n<p>SLECOTECH (Streamline Eco Tech) designs and manufactures industrial shredders, granulators, washing lines, and complete plastic recycling systems. The company is based in Yuyao, Zhejiang, China, and exports to more than 30 countries. When you ask us what a machine draws, we will tell you the specific energy at the screen and material you actually intend to run \u2014 because a kilowatt figure on its own does not let you compare anything.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A buyer in Southeast Asia sent us two quotes for what he described as the same machine. Both had a 90 kW main motor. Both claimed 1.5 tonnes an hour. One was 18% cheaper. The cheap one would have cost him roughly twice as much to run. Not in some vague, hard-to-pin-down way \u2014 in [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"off","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-shredding-machines-industrial-shredders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\r\n<title>Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A shredder&#039;s motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A shredder&#039;s motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Industrial shredders &amp; recycling equipment - Streamline Eco Tech\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ico-logo.png\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"yoyo\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Slecotech\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Slecotech\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"yoyo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 \u062f\u0642\u064a\u0642\u0629\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"yoyo\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e9a08c75b60ad356122c79f2386266\"},\"headline\":\"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why Kilowatts per Ton Is the Only Number That Compares\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\"},\"wordCount\":3219,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Shredders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\",\"name\":\"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"A shredder's motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u9996\u9875\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why Kilowatts per Ton Is the Only Number That Compares\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/\",\"name\":\"Streamline Eco Tech\",\"description\":\"Industrial shredders &amp; recycling equipment\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Streamline Eco Tech\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logo.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Streamline Eco Tech\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/x.com\/Slecotech\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@StreamlineEcoTech-Recycling\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/streamlineecotech\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e9a08c75b60ad356122c79f2386266\",\"name\":\"yoyo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e2a67cdaf0627d37bbb30c7f027b0b0312cc3c01cba381188db3f287c51c6e9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e2a67cdaf0627d37bbb30c7f027b0b0312cc3c01cba381188db3f287c51c6e9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"yoyo\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/49.51.38.20\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/author\/howard\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins","description":"A shredder's motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/","og_locale":"ar_AR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins","og_description":"A shredder's motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.","og_url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/","og_site_name":"Industrial shredders &amp; recycling equipment - Streamline Eco Tech","article_published_time":"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ico-logo.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"yoyo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Slecotech","twitter_site":"@Slecotech","twitter_misc":{"\u0643\u064f\u062a\u0628 \u0628\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637\u0629":"yoyo","\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631":"16 \u062f\u0642\u064a\u0642\u0629"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/"},"author":{"name":"yoyo","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e9a08c75b60ad356122c79f2386266"},"headline":"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why Kilowatts per Ton Is the Only Number That Compares","datePublished":"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/"},"wordCount":3219,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Shredders"],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/","url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/","name":"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why kWh per Ton Wins","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-11-02T06:05:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-02T06:09:08+00:00","description":"A shredder's motor size predicts nothing. kWh per tonne does, and the screen aperture rather than the motor is what decides it. Here is how to compare.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ar","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/plastic-shredder-energy-consumption-why-kilowatts-per-ton-is-the-only-number-that-compares\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u9996\u9875","item":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Plastic Shredder Energy Consumption: Why Kilowatts per Ton Is the Only Number That Compares"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/","name":"Streamline Eco Tech","description":"Industrial shredders &amp; recycling equipment","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ar"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#organization","name":"Streamline Eco Tech","url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logo.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Streamline Eco Tech"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/Slecotech","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@StreamlineEcoTech-Recycling","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/streamlineecotech\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c8e9a08c75b60ad356122c79f2386266","name":"yoyo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ar","@id":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e2a67cdaf0627d37bbb30c7f027b0b0312cc3c01cba381188db3f287c51c6e9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e2a67cdaf0627d37bbb30c7f027b0b0312cc3c01cba381188db3f287c51c6e9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"yoyo"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/49.51.38.20"],"url":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/author\/howard\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2218"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2222,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2218\/revisions\/2222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slecotech.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}